Ohio and Kentucky's Leading Legal Advisors on Non-Compete Agreements
What Types of Non-Competition Agreements or Other Restrictive Covenants Can Affect an Employee?
Non-compete agreements. A non-compete agreement typically restricts an employee from competing with the employer's business for a set time and/or in a specific geographic area after their employment ends.
Non-solicitation agreements. A non-solicitation agreement restricts an employee from soliciting the business of specific customers of the employer within a set time period.
Non-disclosure agreements. A nondisclosure agreement prohibits an employee from using or disclosing confidential information that belongs to the employer.
While the contents of a non-complete may vary from company to company and state to state, they typically attempt to prohibit the employee from things such as:
- Working for a competitor company or competing individual;
- Starting a company that offers the same products or services;
- Developing competing products or providing competing services;
Similarly, a non-solicitation agreement is intended to prohibit an employee from recruiting former colleagues to join their new business or solicit clients or vendors of their former employer.
Are Non-Compete Agreements Enforceable?
The short answer is it depends, on both the state where the agreement is made to be enforced and the terms of the agreement itself. But in states such as Ohio and Kentucky where restrictions are enforceable, a breach can led to legal action and financial liability against a former employee.
Courts look to several factors to determine if the restrictions are enforceable, such as:
- Is the non-compete agreement needed to protect an employer's legitimate businesses interest, such as confidential business information?
- Does the non-compete agreement have a reasonable time limitation?
- Is the non-compete agreement limited to a specific reasonable geographic location?
- Does the non-compete serve to protect a legitimate business interest of the employer or is it simply trying to prevent an employee from seeking other employment that might be more lucrative or have better working conditions?
- Is the non-compete agreement support by "consideration," meaning does the employee receive some benefit for signing the agreement— like a new job, continued employment, more compensation, or stock options — for agreeing not to work for a competitor?
What Should I Do if I Am Asked to Sign a Non-Compete or some other Restrictive Agreement?
Because non-competes can severely limit an employee’s ability to change jobs by limiting where, when, and for what company or in what industry they can work, it is best for employees to not have a non-compete agreement at all. If an employer demands a non-compete, employees should try to negotiate the terms as much as possible both in terms of its in geographic scope and in its duration. It should also be limited as narrowly as possible with respect to the line of work it covers, so as not to prevent an employee from a whole industry or line of work.
With so much at stake, an employee should consult with an attorney before signing a non-compete or other similar agreement. Guessing wrong about the validity of the agreement or what the agreement covers can seriously affect an employee’s ability to work and have serious financial consequences.
What if I Already Have a Non-Compete?
If you have signed a non-compete, it is a good idea to consult with an attorney before making any job change to get advice on what limits the contract imposes and how to best avoid legal action by a former employer and the financial liability that can go with it. If you have been accused of violating a non-compete of other restrictive covenant it is a good idea to seek legal advice to know if or how the agreement affects your current work situation.
The attorneys at Freking Myers & Reul are experienced with these issues and are here to help.
A Down to Earth Approach
Our CLients Share THeir Experiences
-
“Our experience with FMR has been very positive. I particularly appreciated the clear communication regarding the consultation fee to review the situation and determine realistic next steps. Navigating the user-friendly website, completing the initial questionnaire, receiving a prompt response, and meeting with an attorney all helped us understand the possibilities in a way we could comprehend. The initial support team was accommodating and professional. Jon Allison was patient, respectful, and fully present during the review. His expertise and ability to sift through details, listen compassionately and outline options was reassuring. The objective was to reach a mutually agreeable plan of action and we did. Highly recommend!”- Sandy D.
-
“Randy Freking, Katherine Daughtrey Neff, and Jeffrey Silverstein are competent and professional attorneys. They made me feel like I was heard, understood, and respected as a client. They stayed and supported me all day at my mediation, and their guidance and expertise were invaluable. I felt like they really did care, and I truly appreciated that.”- J. Sink
-
“If you are looking for a fast talking, hyperventilating, promise-you-the-world type of attorney , than Mark Napier is not your man. Mark is empathetic, thorough, clever, honest, realistic and very fair. He will include you in every aspect of your case and looks for your input. I highly recommend him.”- Kathleen H.
-
“Thank your Kelly M. for being my confidence during a rough time of my career. Your services were professional, punctuated, helpful, and appreciated.”- Paige
-
“She took the time to understand my needs, explain to me in simple terms what the legal implications were and to follow up with me through resolution in a timely manner. Her staff was always very responsive and helpful. Kelly was able to convey empathy which helped to build trust and make working together seamless.”- Kim B.
-
“I chose the firm based on its reputation and I was not disappointed. I worked with Kelly Myers and she was easy to work with and made the process simple to understand. She represented me in a way that I needed and in the end she was able to improve my outcome. So glad I used her! Highly recommend.”- Mark S.
-
“When I was wrongfully terminated by my previous employer there was not a question of who I needed to contact to get the help I needed. The team of Katherine Neff and Randy Freking was amazing and Katherine is a shark! Katherine was by my side to win an unemployment appeal, and in the end, I got exactly what I asked for and needed. I can not say enough about this firm but if you need help give them a call.”- Mike M.
-
“I've had generally mediocre experiences with (only a few) attorneys over a lifetime, but George Reul is the exception. I met him briefly, relating to an employment matter. He is methodical and primed. For once I did not detect a lawyer simply chasing the dollar. He is thoughtful, asks the right questions, and gives clear advice. If I need more help, I won't hesitate to go back. The staff and operation here, too, is top-notch, professional, and clearly able to deliver quality legal services. Good find!”- John S.
-
“I am very thankful that Mark Napier was recommended to my family. He is an awesome attorney. He is very knowledgeable, personable, and professional. He definitely went above and beyond in researching and preparing for the case. He also referred a brilliant mediator to guide the mediation process. I would highly recommend Mark to anyone needing legal services.”- Vicki G.
